June 2020 oral public comment sign up

As with our in-person meetings, we will be accepting oral public comment for each agenda Item. You will still need to fill out a public comment card to sign up for an opportunity to speak, and oral comments will only be accepted before Council action on each agenda item.

The links below will take you to the public comment card sign up forms for each agenda item. We will use these sign up forms to create lists to call from during the public comment period of each agenda item. When your name is called, we will unmute you from the attendee list at which point you will have the opportunity to give your comment. If there are technical issues, we will move to the next person, and circle back at the end for a second chance.

Public comment sign up is now live. Each comment period will close at Council action for each agenda item.

B. Open Comment Period

C. Administrative Matters

D. Highly Migratory Species

E. Salmon Management

F. Groundfish Management

G. Coastal Pelagic Species Management

NMFS publishes proposed rule for 2020-2021 annual specifications and management measures for Pacific Sardine

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) proposes to implement annual harvest specifications and management measures for the northern subpopulation of Pacific sardine, for the fishing year from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. NMFS is accepting comments through June 11, 2020. Please see the Federal Register notice dated May 27, 2020 to view the proposed rule and how to comment.

If you have questions regarding the proposed rule or comment instructions, please contact Lynn Massey, West Coast Region, NMFS, (562) 436-2462, lynn.massey@noaa.gov.

Southern Oregon/Northern California Coast Coho Technical Workgroup to hold online meeting June 9

This post was generated by and redirects to https://www.pcouncil.org/events/southern-oregon-northern-california-coast-coho-technical-team-to-hold-online-meeting-june-9/.

How CARES Act funds are allocated

(Summarized from a Congressional staff report)

NOAA Fisheries aims to distribute the Sec. 12005 funds as quickly as possible while accounting for regional variability in the size of commercial, charter, seafood processors and dealers, and aquaculture industries. NOAA Fisheries used multi-year averages of annual revenue information from the commercial fishing, charter fishing, marine shellfish and finfish aquaculture, and seafood-related businesses of coastal states, tribes, and territories to proportionately allocate the funding, taking into consideration negative impacts to subsistence, cultural, and ceremonial fisheries during the allocation process.

For commercial fishing, NOAA Fisheries generally used a five-year average of annual commercial fishing revenues as a baseline. Available multi-year averages of aquaculture revenues were also captured in the estimates of average commercial fisheries revenues.

For the west coast, average annual value-added estimates from the seafood sector (i.e., processors, dealers, and wholesalers/distributors) were calculated using regional models. Multipliers were applied to commercial fishing and aquaculture operations revenues to account for the value-add generated by these components of the seafood supply chain (e.g., processing crabs into crab meat). A multiplier was also applied to available multi-year averages of tribal and territorial commercial fishing operations to account for commercial, subsistence, cultural, and ceremonial fisheries. A five-year average of for-hire angler trip expenditures was used to calculate average annual for-hire fishing revenues.

In addition to allocating the funds proportionately based on readily available total average annual revenue data, NOAA Fisheries established a minimum and maximum funding level that each state and territory will receive ($1M and $50M, respectively).

2020: Video review discussions continue

NMFS and the Council’s Groundfish Electronic Monitoring Policy and Technical Advisory Committees are developing draft business rules to implement third-party video review. This includes examining the level of video review necessary to audit logbooks and to audit video review providers. Agency staff and advisory bodies are discussing ways to reduce video review to the minimum level necessary to audit logbooks, as well as the decision points for increasing and decreasing the level of video review based on compliance and other factors.