Joining a meeting hosted by RingCentral

The Pacific Fishery Management Council uses RingCentral to host its virtual meetings. Here’s what you need to know to successfully attend and participate in one of our meetings.

Joining the Council Webinar:

To participate in the Council Webinar you must install the RingCentral app.

Please note: RingCentral recently retired their RingCentral Meeting (Powered by Zoom) app and transitioned to RingCentral Video, an internally hosted virtual meeting platform. If you have previously installed the RingCentral Meeting app, please uninstall it and install the latest version of RingCentral.

Unsupported App
Updated RingCentral Video App

If you wish to join the Council Webinar via web browser only, you can do so, but you will be an attendee in listen only mode. Need to present to the Council but can’t install the app?

Joining any other meeting we host:

For any other meeting we host, you can either use the installed app, or join the meeting through a web browser (without the need to download and install the RingCentral app).

Please note only Google Chrome & Microsoft Edge are currently supported (Firefox and Safari support coming soon).

Join using the RingCentral Video app:

  1. Download and install the RingCentral app.
  2. Launch the app, and click “Join a meeting”
  3. Enter the Meeting ID, and your name. Please add affiliation if applicable
    ex: Kris Kleinschmidt (PFMC IT)
  4. Click Join.
Video demonstrating how to use RCV Application

Join via a web browser:

  1. Click the link to join the meeting from our webpage OR navigate to: https://v.ringcentral.com
  2. If this is the first time you’ve joined via web browser, you may be prompted to allow access to your Mic. You will need to allow. if you happen to have the RingCentral app installed, it may prompt you to open it in the app vs web browser.
  3. Enter Meeting ID & your name, then click “Join.”
Video demonstrating how to join via web browser

I’ve heard I might need a panelist invite. How does it work?

A panelist invite only applies to Council meetings (not advisory body or management team meetings) and is intended for Committee members who cannot install RingCentral on their device.

A Panelist invite will generate a phone number to allow individuals the ability to communicate with the Council to present a report, PowerPoint, etc. It does not apply for giving public comment. The Council hosts its Council meetings using RingCentral Webinar, a variation of RingCentral Video which segregates participants giving presentations from attendees who are listening.

  • If you are using the RingCentral application, you do not need a panelist invite to be able to participate.
  • The only people who need panelist invites are those joining via web browser to give a presentation (public comment requires you to use the RingCentral app)
  • If you will be joining via web browser and will need the ability to speak during the meeting, please fill out our JotForm in advance of the meeting and we will create a panelist invite for you. You will not be able to share your screen, but will be able to communicate.
  • The panelist invite is an automated email from PFMC WEBINAR, and the key information is at the bottom of the invite where the “dial in” instructions are to join via telephone. You will join via web browser first (as an attendee) for the visual portion of the meeting, then follow the instructions in the invite to connect via telephone audio, using the unique to you participant ID to join your telephone to the Panelist list to be able to speak. *6 is your command to mute/unmute yourself.

Alternative options: Join using RingCentral smartphone or tablet app

RingCentral offers an app available in both iOS and Android app stores. Download and install the application to your smartphone or tablet to participate.

Why doesn’t the Council use other platforms that are approved by my organization?

The Council has spent a significant amount of time testing various meeting platforms. Ultimately the decision was made to use RingCentral because it met the primary needs of our organization.

The Council’s role is to host transparent and publicly accessible meetings to help facilitate fishery management. To manage these meetings and to ensure we are not victims of “zoom bombs” and other disruptions, it is important that our meeting platform allow us to limit those who can share their screens, unmute themselves, and control screen annotations, etc., while remaining easy for general public use.

We also need a platform with webinar functionality to host our Council meetings so that we can host hundreds of people and segregate panelists from attendees to ensure a smooth meeting flow. We also offer YouTube live streaming during our Council meetings as another way to make it easy to follow the Council process.

The Council continually looks for alternative solutions as products update and change over time in order to find the best platform that works for our mission.

Questions? Want to schedule a test run? Need assistance?

Please contact Kris Kleinschmidt at 503-820-2412 or kris.kleinschmidt@noaa.gov

PRELIMINARY DRAFT MARCH 2021 MOTIONS IN WRITING

Cautionary Note — These preliminary motions do not represent the final official administrative record. The motions and amendments contained in this blog are as projected on the screen at the Council meeting at the time of the Council vote and often use expedited language and references without the benefit of any final editing or proofing. They may use short-hand language or abbreviations that may not be clear without the context of verbal comments and clarifications made during their development at the meeting, or may contain inadvertent transposition errors. They have not been approved by the Council to represent the final official record of Council action. The final official record will be posted on the Council website after the Council approves the full meeting record at a future Council meeting.

Fact Sheet: Fishery Ecosystem Plan

A beaver
Beavers are important ecosystem restoration elements for salmon. (USFWS)

The purpose of the Council’s Fishery Ecosystem Plan (FEP) is to enhance species-specific management with more ecosystem science, broader ecosystem considerations, and policies that coordinate management across the Council’s fishery management plans and the California Current Ecosystem (the California Current affects the entire West Coast). The FEP helps the Council consider policy choices and tradeoffs as they affect managed species and the ecosystem.

The Council adopted the FEP in April 2013.

The FEP helps improve management decisions by providing biophysical and socioeconomic information on climate conditions, climate change, habitat conditions, and ecosystem interactions. For example, information generated through the FEP helps provide buffers against the uncertainties of environmental and human-caused impacts to the marine environment. The FEP also helps the Council prioritize research needs to address gaps in ecosystem knowledge and policies, particularly with respect to the cumulative effects of fisheries management on marine ecosystems and fishing communities.

The FEP is meant to be an informational document. Information in the FEP, results of the Integrated Ecosystem Assessment, and the annual California Current Ecosystem Status Report are available to the Council for use in management, but how these items will affect fishery management decisions is at the discretion of the Council.

Ecosystem initiatives

The FEP identifies “initiatives,” or actions the Council can take to promote ecosystem-based fishery management. These initiatives are meant to be broad-scale, affecting   more than one fishery management plan.

When the Council adopted the FEP it identified these initiatives to consider taking up in future years:

  • Protection of Unfished Forage Fish
  • Potential Long-Term Effects of Council Harvest Policies on Age- and Size- Distribution in Managed Stocks
  • Bio-Geographic Region Identification and Assessment
  • Cross-FMP Bycatch and Catch Monitoring Policy
  • Cross-FMP Essential Fish Habitat
  • Cross-FMP Safety
  • Human Recruitment to the Fisheries
  • Cross-FMP Socio-Economic Effects of Fisheries Management
  • Cross-FMP Effects of Climate Shift
  • Indicators for Analyses of Council Actions
  • Optimum Yield Considerations

Every March, the Council decides whether to start working one of the initiatives listed above.  Every two years, the Council has the opportunity to identify new initiatives for the future.

The FEP itself is undergoing comprehensive review.

Protecting unfished, unmanaged forage fish

The first initiative taken up by the Council aimed to prohibit the development of new directed fisheries on forage species that are not currently managed, at least until the Council has had an adequate opportunity to assess the science relating to any proposed fishery and any potential impacts to our existing fisheries and communities.

The Council completed work on the initiative in 2015, and protective measures for forage species were added to each of the Council’s four fishery management plans in 2016.

Coordinated Ecosystem Indicator Review Initiative

The Council completed this initiative in 2016. Through this initiative, the Council and its advisory bodies recommended improvements to the annual California Current Ecosystem Status Report to ensure it better supports Council decision making.

Climate and Communities Initiative

The Council embarked on this initiative in 2017 by combining the Cross-FMP Effects of Climate Shift and the Cross-FMP Socio-Economic Effects of Fisheries Management initiatives. The goal of this initiative is to consider strategies for improving the flexibility and responsiveness of Council management actions to near-term climate shift and long-term climate change, and strategies for increasing the resiliency of Council-managed stocks and fisheries to those changes. This initiative is ongoing [learn more].

Council staff

Gilly Lyons is the Council Staff Officer responsible for ecosystem management. You may email her at gilly.lyons@pcouncil.org or call (503) 820-2420 (toll free (866) 806-7204).

Ad Hoc Southern Oregon Northern California Coast Coho Workgroup to hold online meeting March 25, 2021

This post was generated by and redirects to https://www.pcouncil.org/events/ad-hoc-southern-oregon-northern-california-coast-coho-workgroup-to-hold-online-meeting-march-25-2021/.

Current Federal legislation

A list of legislation the Council is tracking is provided below. This list is updated monthly. Use the search field to find sponsors, topics, specific bill numbers, etc. For more information, search Govtrack.us or Congress.gov.

Bill numberBill nameIntroduced byStatusNotesTopic
HR 0059Strengthening Fishing Communities and Increasing Flexibility in Fisheries Management ActDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedSame as HR 200, introduced in previous Congress.MSA reauthorization
HR 0270Genetically Engineered Salmon Labeling ActDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedReintroduction
GMO salmon
HR 0271To amend the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to require labeling of genetically engineered fishDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedReintroduction
GMO salmon
HR 0273Prevention of Escapement of Genetically Altered Salmon in the United States ActDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedReintroduction
GMO salmon
HR 0274Keep Fin Fish Free ActDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedProhibits finfish aquaculture in the EEZAquaculture
HR 0406Shark Sales Elimination ActTed Lieu (D-CA)IntroducedReintroductionShark finning
HR 0455California Clean Coast ActSalud Carbajal (D-CA)IntroducedReintroduction. To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State of CaliforniaOIl and gas
HR 0632Maritime Lien Reform Act Don Young (R-AK)IntroducedReintroduction. To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishingFishing business
HR 0749Remote Seafood Employee Meals Tax Parity ActSuzan DelBene (D-WA)IntroducedReintroduction. Amends the IRS Code so that the 50% limitation on the deduction for meal expenses does not apply to meals provided on certain fishing boats or fish processing facilitiesFishing business
HR 0866FISH Act.Ken Calvert (R-CA)IntroducedReintroduction of FISH Act. Amends the Endangered Species Act to make Dept. of Interior responsible for anadromous and catadromous species, including salmon. The Council has commented on this bill.Management/ESA
S 0497/HR 3128American Fisheries Advisory Committee ActDan Sullivan/Don Young (R-AK)Reported by Senate committee 5/12/21Reintroduction. Establishes the American Fisheries Advisory Committee to assist in the awarding of fisheries research and development grants.Grants/research
S 0276SAVES ActTed Cruz (R-TX)IntroducedReintroduction. Amends the ESA to prohibit the listing of a living nonnative species as a threatened species or endangered species.Management/ESA
S 0381
National Ocean Exploration Act
Roger Wicker (R-MS)Reported by committee 4/28/21 Establishes the National Ocean Mapping, Exploration, and Characterization CouncilResearch
HR 0479California Central Coast Conservation ActJimmy Panetta (D-CA)
IntroducedReintroduction. To establish a moratorium on oil and gas leasing on public land on the Central Coast of CaliforniaOil and gas
HR 0610San Francisco Bay Restoration ActJackie Speier (D-CA)Passed House 6/15/21Reintroduction. To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish a grant program to support the restoration of San Francisco BayHabitat restoration/San Francisco
HR 0644REBUILD ActKen Calvert (R-CA)IntroducedReintroduction. Amends NEPA to assign states, instead of Feds, environmental review responsibilitiesManagement/NEPA
HR 0660Shovel-Ready Restoration Grants for Coastlines and Fisheries ActStacey Plaskett (D-USVI)IntroducedRequires Commerce to establish a grant program to benefit coastal habitats, resiliency, and the economyGrants/fisheries and habitat
HR 0692Recognition of Local Interests in NEPA Decision Making ActLiz Cheney (R-WY)IntroducedAmends NEPA to provide a rule to determine venue for a proceeding for judicial review of certain agency actions.Management/NEPA
HR 0794Climate Emergency Act.Earl Blumenauer (D-OR)IntroducedRequires the President to declare a national climate emergency under the National Emergencies ActClimate change
HR 0849Scientific Integrity Act.Paul Tonko (D-NY)IntroducedReintroduction. Amends the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies for Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific researchResearch
HR 0930SAVES Act.Louie Gohmert Jr. (R-TX)IntroducedReintroduction. Amends the ESA to exempt nonnative species from being treated as threatened or endangered.Management/ESA
HR 0998Offshore Wind Jobs and Opportunity ActWilliam Keating (D-MA)IntroducedEstablishes an offshore wind career training grant programOffshore wind
HR 1354Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Study ActTed Lieu (D-CA)IntroducedDirects the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource study of portions of the Los Angeles coastal area in the State of California to evaluate alternatives for protecting the resources of the coastal areaHabitat
HR 0074Protecting Local Communities from Harmful Algal Blooms ActVern Buchanan (R-FL)IntroducedAmends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to include algal blooms in the definition of a major disasterClimate change/Algal blooms
HR 0629MAST ActDon Young (R-AK)IntroducedReintroduction. Requires Congressional approval of national monument designationsNational monuments
S 0058West Coast Ocean Protection Act.Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)IntroducedAmends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington.Oil and gas
S 0140/HR 3748BLUE GLOBE ActSheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)/Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)Senate version reported by committeeReintroduction. A bill to improve data collection and monitoring of the Great Lakes, oceans, bays, estuaries, and coastsData collection
S 0273/HR 404Driftnet Modernization and Bycatch Reduction ActDianne Feinstein/Ted Lieu (D-CA)IntroducedReintroductionDrift gillnets
HR 1415Tribal Coastal Resiliency ActDerek Kilmer (D-WA)IntroducedAmends the Coastal Zone Management Act to authorize grants to Indian Tribes to further achievement of Tribal coastal zone objectivesGrants/tribes
HR 2515BUILDER ActGarrett Graves (R-LA)IntroducedTo amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to clarify ambiguous provisions, align the Act with relevant case law, reflect modern technologies, optimize interagency coordination, and facilitate a more efficient, effective, and timely environmental review processManagement/NEPA
HR 2519Keep It in the Ground Act of 2021Jared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedTo prohibit drilling in the outer Continental Shelf, to prohibit coal leases on Federal land, and for other purposesOil and gas
HR 2533To provide for a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine examining the impact of ocean acidification and other stressors in estuarine environments.Bill Posey (R-FL)IntroducedTo provide for a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine examining the impact of ocean acidification and other stressors in estuarine environments.Climate change/ocean acidification
HR 2534Climate Stewardship ActAbigail Spanberger (D-VA)IntroducedTo provide incentives for agricultural producers to carry out climate stewardship practices, to provide for increased reforestation across the United States, to establish the Coastal and Estuary Resilience Grant ProgramClimate change/grants
HR 2750Blue Carbon for Our Planet ActSuzanne Bonamici (D-OR)IntroducedTo establish an Interagency Working Group on Coastal Blue CarbonClimate change/blue carbon
HR 2773Recovering America's Wildlife Act of 2021Debbie Dingell (D-MI)IntroducedTo amend the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to make supplemental funds available for management of fish and wildlife species of greatest conservation need as determined by State fish and wildlife agenciesFunding/fish and wildlife
HR 2865To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 to address sexual harassment involving National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration personnelSuzanne Bonamici (D-OR)IntroducedSexual harrassment
HR 2872SAFE ActMatt Cartwright (D-PA)Introduced
To establish an integrated national approach to respond to ongoing and expected effects of extreme weather and climate change by protecting, managing, and conserving the fish, wildlife, and plants of the United States, and to maximize Government efficiency and reduce costs, in cooperation with State, local, and Tribal Governments and other entitiesClimate change
S 1106/HR 2811Shark Fin Sales Elimination ActCorey Booker (D-NJ)/Gregorio Sablan (D-CNMI)IntroducedA bill to prohibit the sale of shark finsShark finning
S 1150Expanding the Maritime Environmental and Technical Assistance ProgramEd Markey (D-MA)IntroducedA bill to authorize appropriations for the maritime environmental and technical assistance program, and for other purposes.Fishing business
S 1372Sustainable Shark Fisheries and Trade ActMarco Rubio (R-FL)IntroducedA bill to amend and enhance the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act to improve the conservation of sharksSharks
S 1420SAFE ActSheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)IntroducedA bill to establish an integrated national approach to respond to ongoing and expected effects of extreme weather and climate change by protecting, managing, and conserving the fish, wildlife, and plants of the United States, and to maximize Government efficiency and reduce costs, in cooperation with State, local, and Tribal governments and other entitiesShark finning
S 1484Forage Fish Conservation ActRichard Blumenthal (D-CT)IntroducedA bill to improve the management of forage fishForage fish
HR 3075To address seafood slavery and combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, and for other purposesJared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedTo address seafood slavery and combat illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing, and for other purposesIUU fisheries, labeling
HR 1144PUGET SOS ActDerek Kilmer (D-WA)Passed House 6/15/21To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to provide assistance for programs and activities to protect the water quality of Puget SoundHabitat restoration/Puget Sound
HR 1447COAST Research Act ActSuzanne Bonamici (D-OR)Passed House 5/18/21To amend the Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring Act of 2009 to establish an Ocean Acidification Advisory Board, to expand and improve the research on Ocean Acidification and Coastal Acidification, to establish and maintain a data archive system for Ocean Acidification data and Coastal Acidification data, and for other purposes.Climate change/ocean acidification
HR 2533NEAR ActBill Posey (R-FL)Passed House 5/18/21To provide for a study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine examining the impact of ocean acidification and other stressors in estuarine environments.Climate change/ocean acidification
S 1894Regional Ocean Partnerships ActRoger Wicker (R-MS)Reported by Committee 6/16/21A bill to designate Regional Ocean Partnerships of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationManagement
HR 3048North Pacific Ocean Preservation ActJared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedTo amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas leasing in certain areas of the Outer Continental ShelfOil and gas
HR 3053American Coasts and Oceans Preservation ActMike Levin (D-CA)IntroducedTo amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil and gas leasing in the Southern California planning areaOil and gas
HR 3160Keep America’s Waterfronts Working ActChellie Pingree (D-ME)IntroducedTo amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to establish a Working Waterfront Task Force and a working waterfronts grant programWorking waterfronts
HR 3228National Coastal Resilience Data and Services ActNydia Velazquez (D-NY)IntroducedTo direct the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to improve science, data, and services that enable sound decision-making in response to coastal flood risk, including impacts of sea level rise, storm events, changing Great Lakes water levels, and land subsidenceClimate change/sea level rise
HR 3431Increasing Community Access to Resiliency Grants Act of 2021Chris Pappas (D-NH)IntroducedTo require the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to establish a website providing information about grants available to assist State, Tribal, and local governments with climate resiliency, adaptation and mitigation, and for other purposes.Climate change/data
HR 3764Occean-Based Climate Solutions ActRaul Grijalva (D-AZ)Reported by House committee 7/14/21To direct the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to provide for ocean-based climate solutions to reduce carbon emissions and global warming; to make coastal communities more resilient; and to provide for the conservation and restoration of ocean and coastal habitats, biodiversity, and marine mammal and fish populations; and for other purposes.Climate change, other topics
S 1995/HR 3702A bill to amend the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act with respect to sport fish restoration and recreational boating safetyMaria Cantwell (D-WA)/Debbie Dingell (D-MI)Reported by Senate committee 6/16/21A bill to amend the Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act with respect to sport fish restoration and recreational boating safetySport fishing
HR 2238Break Free from Plastic Pollution ActAlan Lowenthal (D-CA)IntroducedOcean plastics
HR 3360To amend and enhance the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act to improve the conservation of sharks.Daniel Webster (R-FL)IntroducedTo amend and enhance the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection Act to improve the conservation of sharks.Sharks
HR 3892National Ocean and Coastal Security Improvements Act of 2021Donald Beyer Jr. (D-VA)IntroducedTo direct the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator of NOAA, to provide for ocean-based climate solutions to reduce carbon emissions and global warming; to make coastal communities more resilient; and to provide for the conservation and restoration of ocean and coastal habitats, biodiversity, and marine mammal and fish populations; and for other purposes. (Very similar to Ocean Based Climate Solutions Act).Climate change
S 1728/HR 3396Extinction Prevention ActRichard Blumenthal (D-MA)/Raul Grijalva (D-AZ)IntroducedA bill to create dedicated funds to conserve butterflies in North America, plants in the Pacific Islands, freshwater mussels in the United States, and desert fish in the Southwest United States, and for other purposes.Habitat/funding
S 192River Democracy ActRon Wyden (D-OR)IntroducedAmends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain river segments in the State of Oregon as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers SystemHabitat/Wild and Scenic River
S 2194/HR 4092Coastal Habitat Conservation ActBenjamin Cardin (D-MD)/Jared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedA bill to authorize the Secretary of the Interior, through the Coastal Program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, to work with willing partners and provide support to efforts to assess, protect, restore, and enhance important coastal areas that provide fish and wildlife habitat on which Federal trust species dependHabitat/funding
HR 3692Marine Mammal Climate Change Protection ActJulia Brownley (D-CA)IntroducedTo amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to direct the Secretary of Commerce to establish a climate impact management plan for the conservation of certain marine mammal species, and for other purposes.Climate/marine mammals
HR 3813NEPA Legal Reform ActLiz Cheney (R-WY)IntroducedTo amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to provide for legal reformNEPA
HR 3814UNSHACKLE ActLiz Cheney (R-WY)IntroducedTo amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to impose time limits on the completion of certain required actions under the Act NEPA
HR 3817Regional Ocean Partnership Act of 2021Charlie Crist (D-FL)IntroducedTo allow coastal States to participate in regional ocean partnerships with one or more other coastal States that share a common ocean or coastal area with the coastal State to conserve living resources, expand and protect valuable habitats, enhance coastal resilience, and address such other issues related to the shared ocean or coastal area as are determined to be a shared, regional priority by those States.Management
HR 3906Blue Carbon Protection ActJared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedTo establish a Blue Carbon program to conserve and restore marine and coastal blue carbon ecosystemsClimate/blue carbon
HR 3952NOAA Chief Scientist ActMikie Sherrill (D-NJ)IntroducedTo strengthen the role of the Chief Scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in order to promote scientific integrity and advance the Administration’s world-class research and development portfolio.Science
HR 3973LIST Act of 2021Andy Biggs (R-AZ)IntroducedTo amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide for improved precision in the listing, delisting, and downlisting of endangered species and potentially endangered species.ESA
HR 4057Albatross and Petrel Conservation ActAlan Lowenthal (D-CA)IntroducedTo implement the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and PetrelsSeabirds
HR 4235Living Shorelines ActFrank Pallone, Jr (D-NJ)IntroducedTo require the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to award grants to certain entities for purposes of carrying out climate-resilient living shoreline projects that protect coastal communitiesClimate/grants
HR 4833UntitledAlan Lowenthal (D-CA)IntroducedTo amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to affirm that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act’s prohibition on the unauthorized take or killing of migratory birds includes incidental take by commercial activities, and to direct the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to regulate such incidental take, and for other purposes.Seabirds
HR 4690Sustaining America’s Fisheries for the Future Act of 2021Jared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedReauthorizes the Magnuson-Stevens ActMSA
HR 4335NEPA Accountability and Enforcement ActDavid Schweikert (R-AZ)IntroducedNEPA
HR 4336NEPA State Assignment Expansion ActDavid Schweikert (R-AZ)IntroducedNEPA
HR 4370Listing Reform ActAugust Pfluger II (R-TX)IntroducedESA
HR 4375Twenty-First Century Dams ActAnn Kuster (D-NH)IntroducedTo provide funding to rehabilitate, retrofit, and remove the Nation's dams to improve the health of the Nation's rivers, improve public safety, and increase clean energy production, and for other purposes.Dams
HR 4458KELP ActJared Huffman (D-CA)IntroducedTo establish a grant program within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to award grants to eligible entities for the purpose of carrying out projects on the conservation, restoration, or management of kelp forest ecosystems.Kelp habitats
HR 4671EMPOWERS ActJason Smith (R-MO)IntroducedTo provide for greater county and State consultation with regard to petitions under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and for other purposes.ESA
HR 4712Desalination Development ActMike Levin (D-CA)IntroducedPromotes desalination project development and drought resilience.Desalination
HR 4739UntitledPaul Gosar (R-AZ)IntroducedTo amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to require the submission of certain reports, and for other purposes.NEPA
HR 4740UntitledPaul Gosar (R-AZ)IntroducedTo amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to reform agency process requirements, and for other purposes.NEPA
HR 3813Reef Safe ActJeff Merkley (D-OR)IntroducedRequires standards for “reef safe” and “ocean safe” labels for sunscreenReefs

Fact Sheet: National Environmental Policy Act

NEPA, or the National Environmental Policy Act, was enacted in 1970. NEPA is a major environmental law which applies whenever Federal funds (your tax dollars) are used on a proposed project, such as removing a dam. Conservation and management of a renewable resource (for example, managing a fishery) must also abide by NEPA rules.

NEPA [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] establishes national environmental policy and goals for the protection, maintenance, and enhancement of the environment and provides a process for implementing these goals within Federal agencies.

NEPA requirements

NEPA requires Federal agencies to disclose the environmental consequences of a proposed action, and to investigate and document alternatives to the proposed action. Agencies must make all relevant information available to the public, with opportunities for public comment before a decision is made.

The NEPA process

There are three levels of analysis under NEPA: determining whether a categorical exclusion applies; preparing an environmental assessment (EA) leading to a finding of no significant impact (FONSI); and preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS).

Categorical Exclusion: An action may be categorically excluded from a detailed environmental analysis if d it falls within a category of actions a Federal agency has already determined  has no significant environmental impact. 

Environmental Assessment/FONSI: At the second level of analysis, a Federal agency prepares a written environmental assessment to determine whether or not an undertaking would significantly affect the environment. If the answer is no, the agency issues a “finding of no significant impact,” or FONSI, which may include measures to mitigate any impacts.

Environmental Impact Statement: An EIS is a more detailed evaluation of the proposed action and alternatives. If an agency expects a project to significantly impact the environment, and sometimes when a project is controversial, it may prepare an EIS without having to first prepare an EA.

The public, other agencies, and outside parties may provide input into the preparation of an EIS and then comment on the draft. After the final EIS is prepared and a decision is made, the agency must prepare a public record of its decision explaining how the findings of the EIS were incorporated into the decision‐making process.

Components of an environmental impact statement

The basic components of an EIS include:

  • Purpose and need of a proposed action (e.g., reduce overfishing of a rockfish)
  • Alternatives including the agency’s preferred alternative(end fishing altogether, allow a small amount of fishing, do nothing)
  • Affected environment (includes the fishermen, fishing communities, the resource, and the environment)
  • Environmental consequences (how will the action affect the economics of the fishery, the communities, the resource, etc.?)

The “no action” alternative

A “no action” or “status quo” alternative is required by NEPA and acts as a benchmark. For example, if the Council proposed to change how a fishery is managed, an EIS would need to document the consequences of  not taking action along with the proposed action and other reasonable alternatives.

Choosing an alternative

The NEPA process requires the Council to weigh many factors when choosing a preferred alternative. For example, the biological effects of catch limits must be weighed against the economic and social impacts to the participants of the fishery before the Council chooses a preferred alternative. However, National Standard 1 of the Magnuson‐Stevens Act directs the Council to choose alternatives that prevent overfishing while achieving optimum yield.

NEPA and fisheries management

In order to simplify documentation for the public and decision‐makers, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the fishery management Councils have often combined fishery management plans, plan amendments, and proposed regulations and EISs into one integrated document. By including the four main requirements of NEPA (above) in an EIS, presenting the information to the public before a decision is made, and then presenting a preferred alternative based upon the research and public comment, NMFS and the Council will have made an informed decision, which is the goal of NEPA.

NEPA is just one of the many laws that apply to the fishery management process as dictated by the Magnuson‐Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (see our MSA fact sheet). Other laws include the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, Executive Orders, Regulatory Flexibility Act, and Paperwork Reduction Act.

Why must the Council follow NEPA?

NMFS is the lead agency in implementing fishery management decisions, and takes responsibility for environmental documentation (although Council staff also contribute to NEPA analyses). Since NOAA is a Federal agency where Federal funds are used, NEPA is required. Since the Council submits its proposals to NMFS for review and implementation, it must collaborate with NMFS in meeting NEPA’s procedural requirements.

NEPA and public involvement

Both NEPA and the Magnuson‐Stevens Act encourage public involvement. In creating an EIS, the Council holds public scoping meetings and public hearings that serve as opportunities for public comment. In addition, the process includes comment periods during which the Council is open to receive written comments concerning a specific management plan. Responses to public comments are incorporated and into the final EIS.

Before NEPA, Federal agencies weren’t necessarily required to disclose information to the public before performing an action. Now, because of NEPA, agencies often hold hearings and meetings that provide the public with an opportunity to get involved in the process. The public can comment on proposed management alternatives or propose new solutions that the agency might have overlooked in satisfying a purpose and need. The Council highly values this public input. For more information, see our fact sheet “Getting Involved.”

NEPA Contact: Kit Dahl