HMS fishery descriptions

Surface hook-and-line fishery for albacore

This has been an economically valuable fishery for all three West
Coast states for more than 100 years. The closure of West Coast
canneries in the early 1980s led to precipitous drop in the number
vessels landing albacore. In recent years landings have been
concentrated in the Oregon ports of Newport and Astoria and the
Washington ports of Westport and Ilwaco. This long-term northward shift
in fishing effort into waters off Oregon and Washington, where albacore
have been more available, is thought to be due to changing oceanographic
conditions. In recent years lower operating costs and better landing
facilities in Oregon and Washington compared to California also may have
contributed to this shift. The following graph, showing the number of
U.S. vessels in the albacore fishery making landings by year,
illustrates these trends.

Troll and bait boat (live bait) are the principal commercial gears,
although some albacore is incidentally caught by purse seine, longline,
and large mesh drift gillnet gears. Oceanographic conditions influence
the occurrence of fish within range of the West Coast fleet, but a
typical season runs July through October, with landings peaking in
August-September. This fishery lands albacore almost exclusively with
little incidental catch.

The HMS FMP requires a federal permit with a surface hook-and-line
gear endorsement for all U.S. commercial and recreational charter
fishing vessels that fish for HMS within the West Coast exclusive
economic zone (EEZ, from 3– 200 nautical miles from the West Coast) and
for U.S. vessels that pursue HMS on the high seas (seaward of the EEZ)
and land their catch in California, Oregon, or Washington.

Albacore is mostly landed fresh or frozen, with a portion of the
catch then exported to overseas markets for processing.

A treaty between the governments of the U.S. and Canada allows
vessels from each country to fish in the other country’s EEZ outside of
12 miles. Vessels also have port privileges and Canadian vessels may
land albacore in designated ports. For more information, see the NOAA
Fisheries website
.

In 2023 the fishery landed 3,159 mt of albacore valued at $9.31
million. This was less than 2022 when the fishery landed 7,028 mt valued
at $34.73 million. Over the past 10 years the number of vessels
participating in the fishery has varied from 294 to 604.

The following figure shows albacore landings in metric tons since
1981 through last year by U.S. and Canadian vessels. Note that
confidential data (i.e., landings with less than three vessels or
processors) is excluded in this figure. Less than three Canadian vessels
made landings, or less than three processors received landings from
those vessels, throughout the 1980s.

This figure shows inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue from albacore
for the same time period. As in the previous figure, confidential data
is excluded in this figure.

Drift gillnet fishery for swordfish and shark

This gear consists of floating gillnet panels suspended vertically in
the water column to catch pelagic species. It has a minimum stretched
mesh size of 17 inches and a single set of the gear may not exceed 6,000
feet in length. The gear is set at night targeting thresher shark and
swordfish. In recent decades swordfish has emerged as the dominant
target species, likely due to its higher value compared to thresher
shark and possibly shark conservation measures implemented in the
1990s.

Although historically operating as far north as Oregon, today fishing
occurs south of Monterey, mainly in the Southern California Bight in the
fall and winter.

The fishery originally developed in the 1980s and has been in steady
decline in terms of participation and catch since then. This decline is
at least in part due to restrictions on the operation of the fishery to
mitigate catch of marine mammals and sea turtles.

Both Federal and California limited entry permits are required to
participate. The federal limited entry permit was implemented in 2018
through Amendment 5 to the HMS FMP. It mirrors many of the features of
the state limited entry permit and is required to fish in federal
waters. In addition to these limited entry permits, the HMS FMP requires
a general HMS permit with a drift gillnet gear endorsement for all U.S.
vessels that fish for HMS within the West Coast EEZ and California
requires a general resident or non-resident commercial fishing license,
general gillnet permit, and a current vessel registration to catch and
land fish caught in drift gillnet gear.

In September 2018 California enacted Senate Bill 1017, which created
a program to phase out the fishery by 2024. The program includes a
mechanism to buy back state limited entry drift gillnet permits along
with the surrender of drift gillnet gear for destruction. The Federal
limited entry permit also must be surrendered to participate in the
program. In December 2022 Congress enacted the Driftnet Modernization
and Bycatch Reduction Act, which amends the Magnuson-Stevens Act to
prohibit the use of large mesh drift gillnet gear five years after
enactment (i.e., in December 2027). The Act also directs NMFS to
implement a transition program that will compensate fishery participants
for the cost of permits, surrendered drift gillnet gear, and purchase of
alternative low bycatch gear.

Seasonal temperature fronts that concentrate feed for swordfish are a
major influence on fishing activity but regulatory time-area closures
also have a big influence on seasonal patterns. The fishery is closed in
the West Coast EEZ from February 1 to April 30 and closed within 75
nautical miles of the mainland shore from May 1 through August 14. For
this reason almost all fishing effort occurs after August 15. This
fishery is then effectively closed in an area north of Point Conception
from August 15 to November 15 to protect leatherback sea turtles (the
Pacific Leatherback Conservation Area). As a result, landings mostly
occur from November through January. The fishery also may be closed in
an area south of Point Conception from June 1 to August 31 to protect
Pacific loggerhead turtles during El Niños.

In the last 10 years DGN landings of HMS management unit species have
varied between 75 mt and 239 mt while inflation-adjusted ex-vessel
revenue has varied between $435,342 and $1,582,288. In 2023 the fishery
landed 75 mt valued at $477,517. This was less than 2022 when 82 mt,
worth $462,833 was landed. During that period the number of vessels
participating in the fishery varied from 6 to 21.

The following figure shows HMS landings in the large mesh drift
gillnet grouped by common thresher shark, swordfish, and other HMS for
the past 10 years.

This figure shows inflation-adjusted revenue from HMS over the same
time period.

Harpoon fishery for swordfish

California’s modern harpoon fishery for swordfish developed in the
early 1900s. Prior to 1980, harpoon and hook-and-line were the only
legal gears for commercially harvesting swordfish. At that time, harpoon
gear accounted for the majority of swordfish landings in California
ports. But the development of the drift gillnet fishery in the 1980s
supplanted harpoon gear as the main swordfish fishery. The pelagic
longline fishery has also become a larger source of swordfish landings
on the West Coast in recent years. As a result, participation in this
fishery has declined.

The fishery typically occurs in the Southern California Bight from
May to December, with landings peaking in August, depending on weather
conditions and the availability of fish in coastal waters. Some vessel
operators work in conjunction with a spotter airplane to increase the
search area and to locate swordfish difficult to see from the vessel.
This practice tends to increase the catch-per-unit-effort compared to
vessels that do not use a spotter plane, but at higher operating
cost.

A state permit and logbook are required to participate in the harpoon
fishery in addition to a general resident or non-resident commercial
fishing license and a current CDFG vessel registration along with the
federal general HMS permit.

In the past 10 years harpoon fishery landings of swordfish have
varied between 5 mt and 36 mt while inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue
has varied between $87,381 and $457,347. In 2023 the fishery landed 36
mt valued at $457,347 compared to 32 mt valued at $436,823 in 2022.
During that period the number of vessels participating in the fishery
varied from 11 to 21.

The figure below shows harpoon fishery swordfish landings, in metric
tons, over the past 10 years.

This figure shows inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue from swordfish
over the same period.

High seas longline fishery for swordfish, tuna, and opah

The HMS FMP prohibits pelagic longline fishing within the EEZ.
(Commercial landings of striped marlin, an incidentally caught species,
are also prohibited on the West Coast.) Pelagic longline vessels fishing
outside the West Coast EEZ land swordfish and tuna in West Coast ports,
mainly San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. Historically, pelagic
longline vessels landing on the West Coast have been based in Honolulu
but in recent years some vessels have made San Diego their home
port.

The HMS FMP prohibits targeting swordfish with pelagic longline gear.
However, vessels possessing a Hawaii longline limited access permit may
land swordfish at West Coast ports. More than four-fifths of vessels
landing on the West Coast possess a Hawaii permit.

In recent years pelagic longline has accounted for about two-thirds
of total West Coast swordfish landings and a quarter of tuna landings,
other than albacore tuna.

In the last 10 years the number of pelagic longline vessels making
landings of HMS and opah on the West Coast has varied from 9 to 23.
Landings composition has shifted from swordfish to tunas and other
species over the decade. In 2014 swordfish accounted for 54% and tunas
26% of the 763 mt in landings of HMS and opah made by this fishery. In
2023 swordfish accounted for 5% while tunas accounted for 86% of the 414
mt in landings of HMS and opah. Opah, which is not a management unit
species in the HMS FMP, is also a significant component of landings. In
2023 at 31 mt it accounted for 7% of landings of HMS and opah.

The following figure shows landings trends for tuna, swordfish, opah,
and other HMS in metric tons, over the past 10 years.

This figure shows inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue for the
aforementioned species.

Coastal purse seine fishery for yellowfin, skipjack, and bluefin
tunas

This fishery is prosecuted by small coastal purse seine vessels
operating in the Southern California Bight from May to October. These
vessels usually target small pelagic species, such as Pacific mackerel,
Pacific sardine, anchovy, and market squid. However, they will target
more tropically distributed yellowfin and skipjack tunas when intrusions
of warm water from the south, typically during periodic El Niño
episodes, bring these species within range of this coastal fleet.
Similarly, purse seine vessel operators will target the higher-valued
temperate water Pacific bluefin tuna when they enter the coastal waters
of the Southern California Bight. In recent years, the availability of
Pacific bluefin in Southern California has increased substantially and
has comprised about 15% of landings.

Between 2014 and 2023 purse seine fishery HMS landings have varied
between 167 mt and 2,500 mt while inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue
has varied between $200,761 and $3,274,735. (Earlier years are excluded
due to data confidentiality requirements.) In 2023 the fishery landed
167 mt valued at $200,761. This compares to 602 mt in 2022. During the
past 10 years the number of vessels participating in the fishery varied
from 3 to 14.

The following figure shows purse seine fishery landings of HMS tunas,
in metric tons, between 2014 and 2023. (Some years are excluded due to
data confidentiality requirements.)

This figure shows inflation-adjusted ex-vessel revenue from HMS tunas
for the fishery over the same period.

Deep-set buoy gear

Beginning in 2010 the Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research
(PIER) began design and testing of deep-set buoy gear (DSBG) as a low
bycatch method to catch swordfish. The design was inspired by gear used
off the east coast of Florida, but both the gear and deployment method
were modified to suit conditions on the West Coast. PIER first presented
preliminary results to the Council in March 2012 after the first year of
research trials. In March 2015 PIER submitted an exempted
fishing permit
(EFP) application for review by the Council. Under
its proposal up to five commercial vessels would be authorized to test
the gear with PIER researchers monitoring their activity. (Two other
individuals independently applied for EFPs to test the gear type at this
time.) While fishing under the PIER EFP continued, the Council began
actively soliciting EFP applications to expand the number of vessels
testing the gear. At the same time, the Council began scoping an FMP
amendment to make DSBG a legal gear along with associated fishery
management measures. Since then, the Council has reviewed and made
recommendations on over 100 EFP applications to test DSBG and related
gear configurations and NMFS has issued permits to more than 50 vessels.
To date 42 vessels have made landings with the gear.

Two DSBG gear configurations have been tested. So-called standard
DSBG consists of independently deployed pieces of gear. Each piece
consists of a set of floats at the surface that allows fish strikes on
the gear to be detected, a weighted vertical line that puts up to three
hooks below surface waters where sea turtles and marine mammals
typically occur, or at least 100 meters (55 fathoms, 328 feet) below the
surface. The terms of the EFPs allow no more than 10 pieces of gear to
be deployed at any one time and the gear must be monitored during
deployment. Strike detection leading to fast gear retrieval, deployment
at depth, and active monitoring contribute to low bycatch with this
gear. PIER subsequently developed a linked buoy gear configuration
intended for larger vessels and greater production. Each piece of linked
gear consists of two buoy and vertical line sets joined by a horizontal
line at depth with three hooks attached to it by branch lines. Each of
these gear pieces is joined by a horizontal line at least 11 meters (36
feet) below the surface. As with the standard configuration, no more
than 10 pieces may be deployed at any time and the gear must be actively
monitored. The figure below shows these gear configurations.

Standard and linked DSBG configurations

Standard and linked DSBG configurations

In September 2019 and March 2020 the Council adopted an FMP Amendment
(Amendment
6
) describing management measures including a limited entry permit
program for vessels fishing in the Southern California Bight. The FMP
Amendment was submitted to NMFS for review and regulations authorizing
the gear go into place in 2023. The process to issue limited entry
permits will begin when regulations authorizing the gear are in place.
In the interim NMFS will renew current EFPs to allow fishing to continue
in the Southern California Bight until these permits are issued.

Between 2015 and 2023 DSBG HMS landings (including LBG) have varied
from 12 mt in 2015 and 125 mt in 2020. Inflation adjusted ex-vessel
revenue from HMS varied between $132,589 and $1,227,470. During the past
10 years the number of vessels participating in the fishery varied from
2 to 26.

The following figure shows HMS landings in metric tons during this
period.

This figure shows the resulting inflation adjusted ex-vessel revenue
($1,000s) from HMS for the same time period.

Participation by fishery

The following figures shows trends in the number of vessels making
HMS landings by fishery over the last 10 years.

Seasonality of HMS landings

Landings in HMS fisheries vary throughout the year. This seasonal
pattern of HMS landings is shown in the following two figures showing
average monthly landings over the past 10 years. (Landings in the
albacore surface fishery are shown separately because they are at much
larger scale than the other HMS fisheries.) Overall, landings have been
highest in August at 3,419 mt. and lowest in May at 104 mt.

March 2022 Decision Summary Document

March 9-14, 2022 

Council Meeting Decision Summary Documents are highlights of significant decisions made at Council meetings.  Results of agenda items that do not reach a level of highlight significance are typically not described in the Decision Summary Document.  For a more detailed account of Council meeting discussions, see the Council meeting record and transcripts

Salmon Management

Review of 2021 Fisheries and Summary of 2022 Stock Forecasts

The Council adopted the stock abundances, overfishing limits, acceptable biological catches, and annual catch limits as presented in the 2022 Preseason Report I, for use in 2022 salmon management.

Adopt 2022 Management Alternatives for Public Review 

The Council adopted for public review three management measure alternatives for the 2022 ocean commercial and recreational salmon fisheries beginning May 16. The Council also adopted three alternatives proposed by the Tribes for 2022 treaty Indian ocean salmon fisheries. The Council is scheduled to adopt final 2022 ocean salmon regulations at its April 2022 Council meeting.  The Oregon and California alternatives included inseason actions that were taken during the Council meeting to modify fisheries occurring prior to May 16, 2022.

Appoint Salmon Hearings Officers

The Council appointed officers and reviewed plans for the 2022 public salmon hearings.  The Council has opted to hold all of the salmon hearings virtually.  The Washington and California hearings are scheduled for Tuesday, March 22nd and the Oregon hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, March 23.  

Groundfish Management

Pacific Whiting Utilization – Final Action 

The Council adopted the following as final preferred alternatives:

  1. Move the season start date for the primary whiting season start date north of 40 degrees 30 minutes north latitude from May 15th to May 1st.  Move all administrative deadlines associated with the season start date to 45 days prior to May 1. 
  2. Remove the mothership processor obligation from regulation.
  3. Remove the mothership processor cap from regulation.
  4. Allow a vessel to be registered to a mothership and catcher-processor endorsed permit in the same year, with unlimited transfers.

Stock Definitions 

The Council received notice from the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding status determinations of certain stocks of groundfish, and the inability to make status determinations due to a lack of specificity in the groundfish FMP regarding the definition of certain stocks and whether they are in need of conservation and management. In response, the Council decided to pursue development of a fishery management plan amendment, separate from the 2023-2024 harvest specifications and management measures process, that would more clearly define those groundfish stocks and complexes in need of conservation and management. This process is described as Option 1 in a document  provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Limited Entry Fixed Gear catch Share Program Review 

The Council adopted for public review, the draft review of the limited entry fixed gear permit stacking program, including new lists of research and data needs and recommendations.  None of the recommendations were prioritized for immediate work.  Once the Council actions have been incorporated, the draft report will be posted to the Groundfish FMP Amendment 14 web page.  Comments on the public review draft should be provided for the June 2022 Council meeting, at which time the Council is scheduled to take final action.

Fixed Gear Logbooks – Final Action 

The Council clarified their intent regarding the Federal fixed gear logbooks to specify that the logbook requirement would apply to the non-trawl groundfish fleet as opposed to just the fixed gear groundfish fleet.  The Council adopted a preliminary definition for the term “directed open access” to mean that it is an open access vessel that is targeting groundfish. The Council also specified that the non-trawl sectors required to submit logbooks at program implementation would be groundfish directed open access, limited entry fixed gear (LEFG) sablefish, vessels fishing under LEFG trip limits, and vessels using non-trawl gear in the trawl IFQ program (gear switching). The Council noted the logbook requirement may be expanded to other non-trawl fishery sectors in the future. Additionally, the Council requested NMFS work with state agencies to avoid overlap with state programs and to educate stakeholders as to logbook requirements.

Workload and New Management Measure Priorities 

The Council adopted the list of candidate and prioritized management measures as shown in Tables A and B in E.6.a, Supplemental GMT Report 2, March 2022.  The Council removed item B16 (at-sea processing south of 42° N. lat.) from the list of candidate measures and combined LEFG items (permit price reporting, program cost recovery, removal of base permit) and GAP LEFG recommendations (allow slinky pots, allow vessels with stacked sablefish endorsed permits to fish cumulative non-sablefish limits for each permit, and allow a fourth permit per vessel) into one LEFG follow-on package. 

Inseason Adjustments – Final Action

The GMT, GAP, and stakeholders did not request any changes, and as such, the Council did not recommend any inseason adjustments for March.

Initial Stock Assessment Plan and Terms of Reference 

The Council made preliminary decisions on groundfish stock assessment priorities for 2023 and 2025 as follows:

  • Full Assessments in 2023: black rockfish, petrale sole, copper rockfish, quillback rockfish, and yellowtail rockfish or rougheye and blackspotted rockfishes;
  • Data-Moderate Assessments in 2023: longspine thornyhead, shortspine thornyhead, English sole, and rex sole;
  • Catch-Only Projection Updates in 2023: cowcod, spiny dogfish, and yelloweye rockfish; and
  • Full Assessments in 2025: sablefish, yelloweye rockfish, spiny dogfish, and yellowtail rockfish or rougheye and blackspotted rockfishes (whichever is not assessed in 2023).

The Council also requested feedback on: 

  • How will 2023 assessments proceed in line with discussions on stock definitions?
  • How stocks of the same species may be assessed according to conservation need (i.e., do all areas need to be assessed at once)?
  • Presuming nearshore and shelf stocks should be assessed at as fine a scale as the data allows or when areas are combined, how should regional differences in status be evaluated?
  • The feasibility of a research assessment for shortbelly rockfish in 2023, 2025, or out-of-cycle.

The Council also adopted for public review a Terms of Reference (TOR) for the groundfish stock assessment review process (a separate TOR for the Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) stock assessment review process will be developed later this year), a TOR for groundfish rebuilding analyses, and a TOR for groundfish and CPS methodology reviews.

Final Council decisions on 2023 assessment priorities and TORs is scheduled for the June meeting in Vancouver, Washington.

Update on 2023-2024 Harvest Specifications and Management Measures

The Council gave guidance to the GMT regarding their questions to facilitate completion of their over-winter analyses of proposed management measures for 2023 and 2024. The Council recommended keeping the mid-water Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs) as part of the analysis. Regarding quillback rockfish and copper rockfish off of California, the Council instructed the GMT to not analyze set-asides for quillback rockfish and copper rockfish off of California, but to continue to develop annual catch targets (ACTs) for these species in the areas from 42° to 40° 10’  N. lat. and  40° 10’ N. lat. to the US/Mexico border. The Council recommended the GMT analyze the use of bycatch reduction areas and block area closures as a potential inseason management measure for Pacific spiny dogfish trawl bycatch minimization. Additionally, the Council agreed to include an amendment to the fishery management plan that would align the definition of block area closures with Federal regulation for consideration in this process. The Council added an option to remove the 50 mt ACT for cowcod south of  40° 10’  N. lat. and instructed the GMT to keep the current non-trawl sector specific yelloweye rockfish ACTs  as part of their analyses.  Regarding the new management measure that would modify management of the non-trawl Rockfish Conservation  Area (NT_RCA), the Council agreed with the GAP’s and EC’s recommendation that all areas within the NT_RCA be subject to the same fishing requirements.  Additionally, the Council recommended for NMFS to revisit their proposed new gear definitions based on input from the EC regarding the enforceability of the gear types in the current NMFS proposal.

Pacific Halibut Management  

Incidental Catch Recommendations:  Options for Salmon Troll and Final Action on recommendations for Fixed Gear Sablefish Fisheries

The Council adopted three alternatives for incidental halibut retention in the 2022 and early 2023 Salmon troll fishery, consistent with the Salmon Advisory Subpanel report.  Each alternative included a landing and possession limit of one halibut for every two Chinook, plus one additional halibut in excess of the possession/landing ratio. The possession/landing limit per trip ranged from 25 to 35 halibut among the three options. The Council is scheduled to adopt a final alternative at its April meeting.

The Council’s final recommendation for the 2022 incidental halibut catch restrictions in the fixed gear fishery north of Point Chehalis from April 1 through October 31 was to set the limit at 150 pounds of dressed weight halibut for every 1,000 pounds dressed weight of sablefish, plus 2 additional halibut in excess of the ratio, which was consistent with the Groundfish Advisory Subpanel report.

Ecosystem Management

Fishery Ecosystem Plan (FEP) Five-Year Review – Final Action

The Council adopted revisions to its Pacific Coast Fishery Ecosystem Plan and directed the Ad Hoc Ecosystem Workgroup (EWG) to make any necessary final edits. Once editing is complete, the revised document will be published on the Council website.

2021-2022 California Current Ecosystem Status Report and Science Review Topics

The Council endorsed the EAS and EWG requests to regularly engage with the CCIEA team to discuss improvements to the annual Ecosystem Status Report. This would include identifying word and figure limits to replace the current 20 pages limit on the main report, which would make it easier for the CCIEA team to develop automated production methods, reducing report production workload. The Council noted the value of the fisheries participation network diagrams, analysis of spatial interactions between fisheries and other ocean uses (Appendix P), and the development of indicators to track long-term climate change (Appendix E). Finally, the Council endorsed the SSC’s recommendations on review of research in 2022 supporting the development of indicators, as requested by the CCIEA team.

Fishery Ecosystem Plan Initiatives

The Council directed the EWG to further revise the FEP Initiatives Appendix as presented in its report by adding the Climate-Informed Fisheries Management Initiative described by the EAS in its report. Once revisions are made, the revised FEP Initiatives Appendix will be made available for public review in advance of the September Council meeting. The Council noted broad interest Initiatives 2.1 (Ecosystem and Climate Information for Species, Fisheries, and FMPs) and 2.8 (Assess Flexibility in Fisheries Management Process) in the revised appendix among Council advisory bodies and the public and encouraged the EWG to add further detail when making revisions for the public review version of the Appendix. The Council would again review the Appendix at its September meeting with the aim of adopting the revisions and consider moving forward on one or more of the initiatives described in therein.

The Council directed Council staff to add a webpage to the Council website with information on climate and ocean change. Finally, the Council directed the Executive Director to work with the Council Coordinating Committee to develop a mechanism for regional fishery management councils to annually report on actions they are taking to better prepare fisheries for climate change.

Administrative Matters

Marine Planning 

The Council directed staff to develop comment letters on Oregon offshore wind energy Call Areas, the Morro Bay Wind Energy Area Draft Environmental Assessment, NOAA Aquaculture Opportunity Areas, and the United States Coast Guard Port Access Route Study, for transmittal during upcoming or current comment opportunities, as appropriate. The Council also directed that the draft policy documents on ocean development activities (C.2.a, MPC Report 2 and C.2.a, HC Report 1) be combined into a single document, for consideration at the June 2022 Council meeting. The Council also directed that the Ecosystem Workgroup (EWG) policy document (C.2.a, EWG Report 1) remain as a stand-alone document, with further work on it suspended until the Council provides guidance at the June 2022 meeting. 

Fiscal Matters

The Council approved the scheduling of a Budget Committee Meeting for June 2022 and directed staff to prepare a draft policy and rationale for the use of the Council’s deferred spending account that takes into account  financial risks the Council may face due to funding delays and unforeseen expenses.  The Council expressed support for a NMFS West Coast Region Proposal that was recently submitted that would analyze the potential for reducing the costs of the trawl rationalization program and directed staff to work with the Region staff if funding is awarded.

Membership Appointments and Council Operating Procedures 

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service made changes to their list of Council designees.  

Mr Roy Elicker, Mr David Teuscher, Mr. Tom Sinclair and Dr. Denise Hawkins will be removed from the list, Dr. Benjamin Cross will be added, and Dr. Kyle Hanson, Mr. Roger Root, Mr Michael Clark, and Mr. John Netto will remain.

Additionally, Oregon added Sergeant Heather Van Meter as an alternate Enforcement Consultant.

The Council made the following Advisory Body Appointments:

  • Ms. Lisa Hillier was appointed to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife position on the Coastal Pelagic Species Management Team formerly held by Ms. Lorna Wargo
  • Ms. Lorna Wargo was appointed to the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife position on the Groundfish Management Team formerly held by Erika Wayland
  • Ms. Emily Shallow was appointed to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife position on the Salmon Technical Team formerly held by Mr. Craig Foster
  • Ms. Kandice Morgenstern was appointed to the vacant California Department of Fish and Wildlife position on the Salmon Technical Team
  • Mr. David Kasheta was appointed to the vacant Sport Fisheries At-Large position on the Groundfish Advisory Subpanel
  • Mr. Lyf Gildersleeve was appointed to the vacant Processor North of Cape Mendocino position on the Highly Migratory Species Advisory Subpanel
  • Mr. Donald Vernon to the vacant Idaho Sport Fisheries position on the Salmon Advisory Subpanel
  • Dr. Matthew Reimer was appointed to a vacant At-Large position on the Scientific and Statistical Committee

The Council intends to discuss remaining vacancies for the 2022-2024 Advisory Body term at the June Council meeting.

Ad Hoc Marine Planning Committee to hold online work session Tuesday, April 5, 2022

This post was generated by and redirects to https://www.pcouncil.org/events/ad-hoc-marine-planning-committee-to-hold-online-work-session-tuesday-april-5-2022/.

2022 Council-adopted salmon season tables

The Council-adopted salmon management tables are available by visiting our salmon preseason process and management webpage. These tables were adopted at the Council’s March 2022 meeting.

Please keep in mind the tables are DRAFT until published in Preseason Report II (Preseason Report II is tentatively scheduled for publication on or around March 22).

The Fishery Ecosystem Plan

In March 2022, the Council adopted the revised Fishery Ecosystem Plan, the culmination of a 5-year review process initiated in 2018.

We envision a thriving and resilient California Current Ecosystem that continues to provide benefits to current and future generations and supports livelihoods, fishing opportunities, and cultural practices that contribute to the wellbeing of fishing communities and the nation.

The California Current Ecosystem is shaped by:

  • Dynamic ocean forces like currents, upwelling, and water temperature; 
  • High biodiversity, with dramatic seasonal shifts in predator and prey populations;
  • Diverse human uses of and priorities for estuaries, coastal communities, and the sea.

The Council uses its Fishery Ecosystem Plan to better understand how environmental variability and change, human activities, and social-ecological dynamics affect the future of the ecosystem.  Developing our understanding of how those interacting forces affect the species and fisheries we manage helps us meet our goals and objectives for the ecosystem.

A science-based natural resource management process must be supported by ongoing scientific research and analyses.  Bringing ecosystem science into the Council process helps us understand how individual species are affected by the environment, and how our wide variety of species interact with each other and the people that depend on them.

PRELIMINARY DRAFT MARCH 2022 MOTIONS IN WRITING

Cautionary Note — These preliminary motions do not represent the final official administrative record. The motions and amendments contained in this blog are as projected on the screen at the Council meeting at the time of the Council vote and often use expedited language and references without the benefit of any final editing or proofing. They may use short-hand language or abbreviations that may not be clear without the context of verbal comments and clarifications made during their development at the meeting, or may contain inadvertent transposition errors. They have not been approved by the Council to represent the final official record of Council action. The final official record will be posted on the Council website after the Council approves the full meeting record at a future Council meeting.