Preseason Report II
Analysis of Proposed Regulatory Options for 2009 Ocean Salmon Fisheries
Including Public Hearing Schedule
Published March 2009
|
Download the Entire Preseason Report II Document:
|
|
Entire Preseason Report II Document
|
|
|
Download Preseason Report II by Section:
|
|
Cover, Acknowledgements, Table of Contents INCLUDING PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
|
|
List of Acronyms
|
|
Preseason Report II Text
|
|
Table 1. Commercial troll management options adopted by the Council for non-Indian ocean salmon fisheries, 2009.
|
|
Table 2. Recreational management options adopted by the Council for non-Indian ocean salmon fisheries, 2009.
|
|
Table 3. Treaty Indian troll management options adopted by the Council for ocean salmon fisheries, 2009.
|
|
Table 4. Chinook and coho harvest quotas and guidelines for 2009 ocean salmon fishery management options adopted by the Council.
|
|
Table 5. Projected key stock escapements or management criteria adopted by the Council for ocean fishery options, 2009.
|
|
Table 6. Preliminary projections of chinook and coho harvest impacts for 2009 ocean salmon fishery management options adopted by the Council.
|
|
Table 7. Expected coastwide lower Columbia Natural (LCN) Oregon coastal natural (OCN) and Rogue/Klamath (RK) coho, and Lower Columbia River (LCR) natural tule chinook exploitation rates by fishery for 2009 ocean fisheries management options adopted by the Council.
|
|
Table 8. Projected coho mark rates for 2009 fisheries under base period fishing patterns.
|
|
Table 9. Preliminary projected exvessel value for Council-adopted 2009 non-Indian commercial troll regulatory options.
|
|
Table 10. Preliminary projected angler trips and coastal community income generated under Council-adopted 2009 recreational ocean salmon fishery regulatory options compared to 2008 and the 2004-2008 average.
|
|
Figure 1. Proposed coastal community income impacts associated with the Council adopted 2009 commercial fishery options compared to 2008, and the 2004-2008 average in real (inflation adjusted) dollars.
|
|
Figure 2. Projected coastal community income impacts associated with the Council adopted 2009 recreational fishery options compared to 2008 and the 2004-2008 average in real (inflation adjusted) dollars.
|
|
Appendix A Sacramento River Fall Chinook Ocean Impacts by Fishery and Option
|
|
Map
|
PFMC
03/19/09
|